In a chat with World Economic Form’s founder and executive chairman Klaus Schwab at the recently concluded WEF meet in New Delhi, India’s Finance Minister Arun Jaitley made an earnest attempt to define what is meant by ‘Delivering Growth in the New Context’ which was the theme of the summit, together organised by CII.
Jaitley claims he has a reasonable sense of satisfaction over the government's performance in the last 17 months for a few reasons. First, confidence of domestic and international investors in the India story enhanced at a time when the global markets are going through a challenging phase. Second, the BJP government under Narendra Modi which assumed power at the centre in May 2014, has managed to set a clear direction for Indian economy.
According to Jaitley, India has become more ‘aspirational’ compared with say 25 years ago when those who tried to obstruct change and growth was a majority. Now those who support growth initiatives—both within the government apparatus and among public—outnumber those who resists them. While there are those who oppose these initiatives for political reasons (as Indian is a large functional democracy), they will not be able to do that consistently over the long term.
The government over the one-and-a-half years consistently worked to remove adversarial and oppressive direct tax measures one by one. Now domestic taxation processes are simpler—tax returns can be filed online and taxpayers can get refunds online. The government has also charted a roadmap for bring down corporate tax to 25 per cent while phasing out some exemptions.
Also, the government has made a considerable headway in its attempt to implement GST—the biggest indirect tax reform measure envisaged in the country’s history. The lower house passed the GST bill; all state governments are on board; and the select committee of the upper house approved it. According to Jaitley, GST is only a question of time—the government has the numbers on its side; the bill will pass once it is put to vote.
However, the government is concerned over the fact that capex by private firms is not at a desired level. The slow pace of private sector investments has been conditioned by the over-borrowed and overstretched nature of private firms in the country. Ideally the private sector should lead the government when it comes to investments that aimed at driving long-term growth. But at a time when the global economy is trying to emerge from the slowdown that started in 2008, public investments can take the lead and the private sector can follow suit.
Fortunately, with the current subdued global oil and commodity price regime, there is a visible availability of public investment resources. Therefore, the government is in a position to make sure investments happen in infra and other sectors, supported by the public sector. Also, with the liberalisation in the FDI policy, India has attracted one of the largest FDIs anywhere in the world. So with large public investments and significantly huge FDI inflow, the investment cycle is expected to be revived.
To supplement this momentum, the government is also addressing issues of stressed sectors such as steel, which has been hurt by cheep steel imports from China, and power. The government is expected to announce initiatives to revive these sectors.
It is also planning to enhance initiatives to build infrastructure to support growth. In fact, inflows from the subsidy reform supported by the dip in oil and commodity prices lend the government extra resources to augment investments in this space. The drop in oil prices also helped improve balance sheet of oil firms, growth of which can enhance overall economic revival given the size of oil majors. Besides, the infrastructure cess announced by the government is expected to provide further leg-up for investments in infrastructure.
In an attempt to enhance growth momentum, the government is also earmarking huge investments to revive railways. The railways, despite being a sunshine sector, has seen abysmally slow growth (it saw addition of hardly 10-12 per cent in terms of size of tracks, for instance) over the last 60 years. With expected public and private sector investments, including participation from international firms, this is expected to change and railways is estimated to see far-reaching reforms. LIC has already agreed to lend a Rs 150,000 crore infra loan which will be used to redevelop more than 400 railway stations.
To supplement its reform initiatives, the government is also trying to streamline the legal framework currently existing in the country. Some provisions of the Indian law are obsolete. For instance, the arbitration process goes on and on. The government has issued an ordnance which provides fast track arbitration by a single arbitrator—the arbitrator has to sit on a day to day basis to close contractual disputes. It has also issued an ordinance to set up a commercial bench at every high court to settle arbitration which is beyond the scope of the arbitrator.
Will its earnest attempts to streamline tax regime, build infrastructure and revive the investment cycle help the Modi government to deliver growth in the changing socioeconomic milieu and challenging economic scenario prevailing globally? One has to wait and watch.
Jaitley claims he has a reasonable sense of satisfaction over the government's performance in the last 17 months for a few reasons. First, confidence of domestic and international investors in the India story enhanced at a time when the global markets are going through a challenging phase. Second, the BJP government under Narendra Modi which assumed power at the centre in May 2014, has managed to set a clear direction for Indian economy.
According to Jaitley, India has become more ‘aspirational’ compared with say 25 years ago when those who tried to obstruct change and growth was a majority. Now those who support growth initiatives—both within the government apparatus and among public—outnumber those who resists them. While there are those who oppose these initiatives for political reasons (as Indian is a large functional democracy), they will not be able to do that consistently over the long term.
The government over the one-and-a-half years consistently worked to remove adversarial and oppressive direct tax measures one by one. Now domestic taxation processes are simpler—tax returns can be filed online and taxpayers can get refunds online. The government has also charted a roadmap for bring down corporate tax to 25 per cent while phasing out some exemptions.
Also, the government has made a considerable headway in its attempt to implement GST—the biggest indirect tax reform measure envisaged in the country’s history. The lower house passed the GST bill; all state governments are on board; and the select committee of the upper house approved it. According to Jaitley, GST is only a question of time—the government has the numbers on its side; the bill will pass once it is put to vote.
However, the government is concerned over the fact that capex by private firms is not at a desired level. The slow pace of private sector investments has been conditioned by the over-borrowed and overstretched nature of private firms in the country. Ideally the private sector should lead the government when it comes to investments that aimed at driving long-term growth. But at a time when the global economy is trying to emerge from the slowdown that started in 2008, public investments can take the lead and the private sector can follow suit.
Fortunately, with the current subdued global oil and commodity price regime, there is a visible availability of public investment resources. Therefore, the government is in a position to make sure investments happen in infra and other sectors, supported by the public sector. Also, with the liberalisation in the FDI policy, India has attracted one of the largest FDIs anywhere in the world. So with large public investments and significantly huge FDI inflow, the investment cycle is expected to be revived.
To supplement this momentum, the government is also addressing issues of stressed sectors such as steel, which has been hurt by cheep steel imports from China, and power. The government is expected to announce initiatives to revive these sectors.
It is also planning to enhance initiatives to build infrastructure to support growth. In fact, inflows from the subsidy reform supported by the dip in oil and commodity prices lend the government extra resources to augment investments in this space. The drop in oil prices also helped improve balance sheet of oil firms, growth of which can enhance overall economic revival given the size of oil majors. Besides, the infrastructure cess announced by the government is expected to provide further leg-up for investments in infrastructure.
In an attempt to enhance growth momentum, the government is also earmarking huge investments to revive railways. The railways, despite being a sunshine sector, has seen abysmally slow growth (it saw addition of hardly 10-12 per cent in terms of size of tracks, for instance) over the last 60 years. With expected public and private sector investments, including participation from international firms, this is expected to change and railways is estimated to see far-reaching reforms. LIC has already agreed to lend a Rs 150,000 crore infra loan which will be used to redevelop more than 400 railway stations.
To supplement its reform initiatives, the government is also trying to streamline the legal framework currently existing in the country. Some provisions of the Indian law are obsolete. For instance, the arbitration process goes on and on. The government has issued an ordnance which provides fast track arbitration by a single arbitrator—the arbitrator has to sit on a day to day basis to close contractual disputes. It has also issued an ordinance to set up a commercial bench at every high court to settle arbitration which is beyond the scope of the arbitrator.
Will its earnest attempts to streamline tax regime, build infrastructure and revive the investment cycle help the Modi government to deliver growth in the changing socioeconomic milieu and challenging economic scenario prevailing globally? One has to wait and watch.
No comments:
Post a Comment